بررسی کارآئی روش های تجربی برآورد تبخیر- تعرق مرجع (بر پایه تشتک تبخیر) در اقلیم های مختلف (مطالعه موردی ایران)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استاد گروه مهندسی آب دانشگاه رازی

2 مهندسی آب ، کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی، دانشگاه رازی، کرمانشاه، ایران

چکیده

در این تحقیق جهت تعیین بهترین روش برآورد تبخیر- تعرق گیاه مرجع در بین روش‌های بر پایه تشت تبخیر برای اقلیم‌های مختلف از آمار واطلاعات هواشناسی روزانه طی 15 سال (2013-1999) در153 ایستگاه سینوپتیک سراسرکشور استفاده شد. تبخیر - تعرق مرجع برای کل ایستگاه‌های سینوپتیک کشور، از 12 روش بر پایه تشتک تبخیر محاسبه شد، همچنین ازروش فائو- پنمن- مانتیث ‌به عنوان روش استاندارد برای ارزیابی دیگر روش‌ها استفاده گردید. برای ارزیابی دقت مدل‌ها از آزمون‌های آماری RMSE،MBE ، R2 و t استفاده بعمل آمد. نتایج نهایی نشان داد که در دو اقلیم خشک و نیمه‌خشک کشور روش‌های محمد و همکاران، فائو- 24 در شرایط خشک و کریستیانسن مناسب‌ترین و روش‌های اشنایدر ،آلن و پروت، راگووانشی و والندر، نامناسب‌ترین روش‌های برآورد تبخیر- تعرق بودند. برای اقلیم مدیترانه‌ای روش‌های محمد و همکاران، کونیکا و اشنایدر، مناسب ترین و روش‌های پرییرا، فائو- 24 در شرایط خشک و راگووانشی و والندر به عنوان نامناسب‌ترین روش‌ها شناخته شدند. در اقلیم نیمه مرطوب روش‌های اشنایدر اصلاح شده، آلن و پروت و پرییرا مناسب‌ترین و روش‌های محمد و همکاران، فائو-24 در شراط خشک و راگووانشی و والندر نامناسب‌ترین روش‌ها بودند. در اقلیم‌های مرطوب و بسیار مرطوب به ترتیب روش‌های اشنایدر اصلاح شده و فائو-56 (آلن ، 1998) بهترین و روشهای پرییرا، فائو24- در شرایط بدون پوشش محمد و همکاران و فائو-24 در شرایط خشک و روش‌های راگووانشی و والندر بدترین روش‌ها بودند. در نهایت مقایسه نتایج حاصل از مطالعات لیسیمتری در اقلیم نیمه خشک صحت روش‌های انتخابی را تایید نمود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Evaluating efficiency of empirical estimation reference evapotranspiration (Pan based method) in different climate conditionss (Case Study of Iran)

نویسنده [English]

  • Narges Soultani 2
1
2 Water Resources, Agriculture and Natural Resources, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran
چکیده [English]

In this research, daily meteorological data for 15 years (1999-2013) were used in 153 synoptic stations throughout the Iran country to determine the best estimation methods for evapotranspiration of reference plant among pan evaporation methods for different climate conditions. For the total synoptic stations of the country, evapotranspiration was calculated from 12 evaporation pan methods, and the FAO-Penman-Monteith method was used as the standard for evaluating with pan methods. RMSE, MBE, R2 and t tests were used to evaluate the accuracy of the methods. The final results showed that in two arid and semi-arid climates, Mohammad et al , FAO-24 (in dry conditions) and Christensen methods were the most suitable methods and different methods as Schneider, Allen and Prout, Ragvanshi and Waldner were the most inappropriate methods. For the Mediterranean climate condition, Mohammed et al, Konica and Schneider were the most appropriate methods and Pereira's, FAO-24 (in dry conditions), Ragvanshi and Waldner were identified as the most inappropriate methods. In the semi-humid climate, the modified Schneider method, Allen, Prout, and Pryira were the most appropriate methods and Mohamad et al, FAO-24 (in dry condition), Ragvanshi and Waldner and were the most inappropriate methods. In the wet and humid climates conditions, modified Schneider method, (Alan et al 1998) were the best and Pryira, FAO-24 (in dry conditions) and Mohammed et al, Ragvanshi and Waldner methods were the worst methods respectively. Moreover, Finally, comparing the results of lysimetric studies in semi-arid climate confirmed the selected methods.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Reference plant evapotranspiration
  • Pan based method
  • statistical tests
  • Lysimetric studies

مراجع

  1. Akbari D (2010) Estimation of pan coefficient for calculating evapotranspiration (Case Study: Sari Synoptic Station). Journal of Research in Agricultural Sciences.2(7):65-74 (In Persian)
  2. Alizadeh A (2006). The principles of applied hydrology. Astane Ghodse Razavi Publications.872p (In Persian)
  3. Alizadeh A (2009) Water, soil and plant relationship. Kankash Pub.415p (In Persian)
  4. Allen R, Pruitt W.O (1991) FAO-24 reference evapotranspiration factors. Journal of  Irrigation and Drainage Engineering ASCE 117(5):758–773
  5. Allen R., Pereira L, Raes D, Smith M (1998)   Crop evapotranspiration. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56. FAO. Rome. Italy. 293 p
  6. Amiri M, Abedikoopaei J, Khazaei M (2008) Estimation best method of class A pan coefficient for estimating daily evapotranspiration in Esfehan province. In: Proc.Third National Conference on Integrated Water Resources Management.Tabriz.8p. https://www.civilica.com/Paper-WRM03-WRM03_175.html (In Persian)
  7. Bayatvarkeshi M, and Abyaneh H.Z (2014)  Validating pan coefficient equations to estimate reference evapotranspiration in comparing with lysimeter data of grass crop.Global Journal on Advances in Pure & Applied Sciences [Online].2: 9-18
  8. Cuenca R.H (1989) Irrigation system design: an engineering approach. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, p 133
  9. Doorenbos J, Pruitt W.O (1977) Crop water requirements.FAO, Rome, FAO Irrigation and Drainage. paper no. 24 (rev.)
  10. Estehbanati and bakhtiari (2016) Comparing evapotranspiration obtained from some of pan evaporation equations using ASCE Standard Penman-Monteith model in an arid climate. Journal of Irrigation & Water Engineering. 6(24):90-102(In Persian)
  11. Ghamarnia H, Daechin S, Jalili Z, Farmani M, Razdar B (2012) Comparing the coefficent estimates pan evapotion  method s to calculate reference crop evapotrancpiration(Case study:Synoptic station of Zanjan).In: Proc. Third National Conference on Integrated Water Resources Management. Tabriz.10p. https://www.civilica.com/Paper-NCUIMWR03-NCUIMWR03_150.html  (In Persian)
  12. Ghamarnia H, Mousabeygi, F, Amiri S, Amirkhani D (2015) evaluation of a few evapotranspiration models using lysimeteric measurements in a semi arid climate region. International Journal of Plant & Soil Science 5(2): 100-109(In Persian)
  13. Grismer M.ASCE, Orang Morteza and Matyac Scott (2002) Pan evaporation toevapotranspiration conversion methods. Journal of  Irrigation and  Drainage Eng.128(3): 180–184
  14. Gundekar, H.G (2004) Evapotranspiration estimation methods and development of crop coefficients for some crops in semi-arid region.An unpublished MTech Dissertation submitted to Marathwada Agricultural university Parbhani, Maharashtra, India
  15. Irmak S, Haman D.Z, and Jones J.W (2002) Valuation of class pans coefficients for estimating reference evapotranspiration in humid location. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage. Eng. ASCE. 128 (3):153-159
  16. Jensen M.E, Burman, R.D, and Allen R.G (1990) Evapotranspiration and irrigation water requirements, ASCE Manual and Report on Engineering Practice. No.70. New York.
  17. Kaboosi K (2012) The investigation of error of pan evaporation data, estimation of pan evaporation coefficient by pan data and its comparison with empirical equations. International Journal of Agriculture and Crop Sciences.4(19):1458-1465
  18. Mousavi Beygi M, Erfan M, Sarmad M (2009) Estimation of reference crop evapotranspiration using the least meteological data(Study caes:khorasan Razavi province). Journal of Water and Soil.1:91-99(In Persian)
  19. Orang M (1998) Potential accuracy of the popular non-linear regression equations for estimating pan coefficient values in the original and FAO-24 Table, Unpublished Rep,Calif. Department of Water Resources, Sacramento
  20. Pereira A.R, Villanova N, Pereira A.S, Baebieri V.A (1995) A model for the class-A pan coefficient. Agric Water Manage 76:75–82
    1. Raghuwanshi  N.S, Wallender W.W (1998) Converting from pan evaporation to evapotranspiration. Journal of irrigation and drainage engineering. 124(5): 275-277
  21. Rahimi Khoob A (2008) Artificial neural network estimation of reference evapotranspiration from pan evaporation in a semi-arid environment. Journal of Irrigation Science. 27:35-39(In Persian)
  22. Rosenberg N.J, and Powers (1970) Potential for evapotranspiration and its manipulation in the plains region, Proc. Symp. Evapotranspiration Great Plains, Great Plains Agric. Council Publ. (50): 275-300
  23. Sabziparvar A.A, Bayatvarkeshi M, Ghasemi A (2008) Evaluation of different methods for estimating evapotranspiration in two different climates (Case study: Hamadan, Karaj, Gorgan). In: Proc.Third National Conference on Integrated Water Resources Management.Tabriz.7p. https://www.civilica.com/Paper-WRM03-WRM03_178.html(In Persian)
  24. Sabziparvar A.A, Shadmani M (2012) Evaluation of pan coefficients from ANN, ANFIS, and empirical methods, for estimation of daily reference evapotranspiration. Journal of The Earth and Space Physics.38(1):229-240(In Persian)
  25. Shokri S, Hooshmand A.R, Ghorbani M (2016) The estimation evaopration pan coefficient for calculating reference evapotrancpiration in Ahvaz. Journal of Irrigation Science and Engineering.40(1):1-12 (In Persian)
  26. Seifi A, Mirlatifi S.M, Riahi H (2011) Developing a combined model of multiple linear regression- principal component and factor analysis(MLR-PCA) for estimation of  reference evapotrancpiration(Case study: Kerman station). Journal of Water and Soil. 24(6):1186-1196(In Persian)
  27. Shahabifar M, Asari M, koochakzadeh M, Mirlatifi M. (2010) Lysimetric evaluation of common methods of calculating standard grass reference crop evapotranspiration in greenhouse. Iranin Journal of Water Research in Agriculture (Formerly Soil and Water Science). 24(1B):13 -19(In Persian)
  28. Sharifian H, Ghahraman B, (2007) Evaluation and comparison estimated reference evapotrancpiration from evapotion with ETo standard method in Gorgan. Journal of Agricultur Science And Nature Resourse.13(5):18-28(In Persian)
  29. Snyder R.L (1992) Equation for evaporation pan to evapotranspiration conversions. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering ASCE 118(6):977–980
  30. Snyder, R, L., Orang, M. Matyac,S.,and Mark E. Grismer, M.ASCE (2005) Simplified estimation of reference evapotranspiration from pan evaporation data in california. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering.131(3):249
  31. Yazdani V, Liaghat A, Noori H, Noori H, Zare Abianeh H, (2011) A determination of the best model for calculation of pan coefficient in Amol as based on sensitivity analysis. Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Research.42(1):9-17(In Persian)
  32. Zareabayneh H, Bayat Varkeshi M, Sabziparvar A.A, Marofi S, Ghasemi A, (2010) Evaluation of different reference evapotranspiration methods and their zonings in Iran. Journal of Physical Geography Research Quarterly.42(74):95-109(In Persian)
  33. Zareabayneh H, Noori H, Liaghat A, Noori H, Karimi V, (2011) Comparison of Penman- Monteith FAO method and class A pan evaporation with lysimeter measurements in estimation of rice evapotranspiration in Amol region. Journal of Physical Geography Research Quarterly. 43(76):71-83(In Persian)

 

 

 

 

 

 

تحقیقات منابع آب ایران
دوره 14، شماره 4
دی 1397
صفحه 170-183

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 07 آبان 1396
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 17 خرداد 1397
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 18 خرداد 1397

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار